Politics

Confusion among lawyers as Justice Tanko replaced Onnoghen

Lawyers have taken a look at the case of Onnoghen from different stance... Some condemn the decision of the President, while some are of the view that Onnoghen ought to have stepped down even before now

The case of Onnoghen’s suspension is not going without confusion among Nigerian lawyers. Some lawyers are of the believe that the President is out of line to suspend the CJN, while some are of the believe that Onnoghen has only brought more embarrassment to Nigeria judiciary by not stepping down earlier before now

Mr Seyi Sowemimo (SAN), in his opinion, told the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) that the president does not have the power to remove the CJN.

“The only powers for removal is vested in the Senate

“However, the suspension of the CJN is not specifically provided in the Constitution, it is the National Judicial Commission (NJC) that is vested with the powers to suspend judges,” Sowemimo said.

He added that there was no previous decision of the courts in such a situation so “it is only the courts that will resolve this issue

“This is the first time the executive is suspending a CJN, therefore, we are totally in an uncharted territory; the courts will have to resolve the matter”.

Sowemimo, however, said the way the judges handled the matter would either give the citizens confidence that the judiciary is a body with great integrity or whether it is a body that will only act in its own self-interest.

Also Read: Walter Onnoghen: The case against CJN is prosecutorial misadventure- Femi Falana

On the other end as reported by NAN, Mr Ogedi Ogu, said: ” We have expected the CJN to step aside on his own, based on his own defence in the alleged failure to declare assets.

The CJN lacks the morality to continue in that office because ignorance on its own is not an excuse. As the chief custodian of the judiciary, saying he forgot to declare his assets, is an admittance to the allegation, he should have stepped aside honourably”.

—Lawyer Ogu

“The CJN lacks the morality to continue in that office because ignorance on its own is not an excuse.

“As the chief custodian of the judiciary, saying he forgot to declare his assets, is an admittance to the allegation, he should have stepped aside honourably”.

Also Read: New Chief Justice of Nigeria sworn-in by President Muhammadu Buhari

Ogu also said that whether the executive had powers to suspend the CJN should be contested in the court since there is no express provision to that effect.

He however blamed Onnoghen for not abiding by the provisions of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA in his own case.

Ogu said that a provision of ACJA stated that no question to the jurisdiction of the court should be entertained until the prosecution had closed its case.

“Same CJN who applauded the provisions of the ACJA is going about ‘forum-shopping’ filing injunctions to stop the CCT from arraigning him.

“I believe that the FG was circumstantially compelled to suspend him,” Ogu said.

Related Articles

NEWSLETTER
Let's keep you updated with the ongoings on Brain Trust Hub
We respect your privacy.
Close
Close